2015 • Renault
Kadjar
Renault Kadjar Icon 2015 1.5 dCi 110 HPOverall Score67.25/100
2015 Renault Kadjar vs 2013 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Mitsubishi
ASX
Mitsubishi ASX 1.6 MIVEC (117 Hp) 2013Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Renault Kadjar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 10 points.
67.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault KadjarSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
RenaultMakeMitsubishi
KadjarModelASX
2015Model year2013
CrossoverBody typeSUV
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
Renault KadjarSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
11,7 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
181 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
110 HPPower117 HP
250 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault KadjarSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank63 lt
3,8 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault KadjarSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
EDCTransmission—
17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault KadjarSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
4449 mmLength4295 mm
1836 mmWidth1770 mm
1607 mmHeight1625 - 1635 mm
1407 kgWeight1260-1285 Kg
472 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2670 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Renault Kadjar and 2013 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Kadjar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 10 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…