DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2002 Kia Shuma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Shuma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeKia
156ModelShuma
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
200 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1793 cc
120 HPPower114 HP
144 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65R15Tyre size195/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4430 mmLength4525 mm
1745 mmWidth1720 mm
1415 mmHeight1415 mm
1230 KgWeight1135 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2002 Kia Shuma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…