DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Renault Espace vs 2010 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeGreat Wall
EspaceModelCowry
2010Model year2010
Minivan, MPVBody typeMinivan
7Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
340 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4661 mmLength4574 mm
—Width1704 mm
1801 mmHeight1845 mm
1976 KgWeight1510 Kg
2803 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Renault Espace and 2010 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…