DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Renault Clio vs 2018 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
ClioModelFigo
2018Model year2018
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h—
167 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1149 ccEngine displacement1196 cc
75 HPPower88 HP
107 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4062 mmLength3995 mm
1777 mmWidth1695 mm
1448 mmHeight1525 mm
980 kgWeight—
300 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2491 mm

Additional Features

Renault ClioDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation
Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Renault Clio and 2018 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…