DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Renault Clio vs 2017 Ford EcoSport Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
ClioModelEcoSport
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
170 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
75 HPPower100 HP
200 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank52 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption4,5 lt
3,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size205/60 R16; 205/50 R17; 215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4062 mmLength4096 mm
1777 mmWidth1765 mm
1448 mmHeight1653 mm
1071 kgWeight1213 Kg
300 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2519 mm

Additional Features

Renault ClioDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Renault Clio and 2017 Ford EcoSport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…