DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Renault Clio vs 2017 Renault KWID Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault KWID

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelKWID
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h—
167 km/hTop speed135 km/h
1149 ccEngine displacement999 cc
75 HPPower68 HP
107 NmTorque91 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank28 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4062 mmLength3679 mm
1777 mmWidth1579 mm
1448 mmHeight1478 mm
980 kgWeight699 Kg
300 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2422 mm

Additional Features

Renault ClioDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Renault Clio and 2017 Renault KWID approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault KWID leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…