DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Renault Clio vs 2006 Seat Altea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSeat
ClioModelAltea
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
215 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
200 HPPower170 HP
215 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3991 mmLength4325 mm
1768 mmWidth1768 mm
1484 mmHeight1568 mm
1240 KgWeight1446 Kg
2585 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Renault Clio and 2006 Seat Altea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…