DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 1999 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
156ModelS40
1999Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1731 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
144 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4430 mmLength4483 mm
1745 mmWidth1717 mm
1415 mmHeight1411 mm
1230 KgWeight1286 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Alfa Romeo 156 and 1999 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…