2000 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 2.0 16V Sport (CB0M) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Renault Clio vs 2000 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 2.0 HGT 20V (154 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.
65.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Bravo
RenaultMakeFiat
ClioModelBravo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Bravo
7,3 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
220 km/hTop speed213 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
169 HPPower154 HP
200 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Bravo
3773 mmLength4025 mm
1640 mmWidth1755 mm
1420 mmHeight1410 mm
1035 KgWeight1165 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Renault Clio and 2000 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…