DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Clio vs 1996 Toyota Mark II Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Mark II

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeToyota
ClioModelMark II
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/3Doors4

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
175 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5+1Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4760 mm
—Width1760 mm
—Height1400 mm
1010 KgWeight1320 Kg
—Wheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Clio and 1996 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…