DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Renault Clio vs 1994 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSuzuki
ClioModelVitara
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
161 km/hTop speed144 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1589 cc
64 HPPower80 HP
118 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size195 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3773 mmLength3620 mm
1640 mmWidth1630 mm
1417 mmHeight1665 mm
975 KgWeight1020 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Renault Clio and 1994 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…