DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Renault Clio vs 1992 Lancia Delta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Delta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeLancia
ClioModelDelta
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4+1
3/5Doors5

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
161 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1600 cc
64 HPPower90 HP
118 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank59 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption10 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3773 mmLength—
1640 mmWidth—
1417 mmHeight—
975 KgWeight1005 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Renault Clio and 1992 Lancia Delta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Delta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…