1997 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.8 i RSi (107 Hp) 1997Overall Score56.25/100
1997 Renault Clio vs 1997 Mazda Capella Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 1.8 i (125 Hp) 1997Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda Capella
RenaultMakeMazda
ClioModelCapella
1997Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda Capella
8,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
107 HPPower125 HP
150 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda Capella
PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda Capella
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/60 R14 HTyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda Capella
3709 mmLength4575 mm
1616 mmWidth1695 mm
1395 mmHeight1440 mm
955 KgWeight1210 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Renault Clio and 1997 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…