DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Renault Clio vs 1995 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolkswagen
ClioModelSharan
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3/5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h19,3 s
185 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
88 HPPower90 HP
145 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength4620 mm
1616 mmWidth1810 mm
1395 mmHeight1730 mm
950 KgWeight1775 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Renault Clio and 1995 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…