1995 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.8 i (88 Hp) 1995Overall Score49.25/100
1995 Renault Clio vs 1995 Fiat Tempra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Fiat
Tempra
Fiat Tempra 1.8 i.e. (159.BY) 1995Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Tempra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Tempra
RenaultMakeFiat
ClioModelTempra
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Tempra
9,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
185 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1756 cc
88 HPPower101 HP
145 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Tempra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,6 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Tempra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Tempra
3709 mmLength4354 mm
1616 mmWidth1695 mm
1395 mmHeight1445 mm
950 KgWeight1168 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Renault Clio and 1995 Fiat Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…