DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Renault Clio vs 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 33

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAlfa Romeo
ClioModel33
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
185 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1712 cc
88 HPPower107 HP
145 NmTorque149 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
165/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength4075 mm
1616 mmWidth1615 mm
1395 mmHeight1375 mm
950 KgWeight1020 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Renault Clio and 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 33 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…