DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Renault Clio vs 1990 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
ClioModelCapella
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
158 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3709 mmLength4515 mm
1616 mmWidth1690 mm
1395 mmHeight1375 mm
955 KgWeight1190 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Renault Clio and 1990 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…