DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Clio vs 2009 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFiat
ClioModelBravo
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
190 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
110 HPPower90 HP
151 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank57 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3818 mmLength4336 mm
1639 mmWidth1792 mm
1417 mmHeight1498 mm
1150 KgWeight1320 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Clio and 2009 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…