DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Renault Clio vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFiat
ClioModelBravo
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
186 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
110 HPPower90 HP
151 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank57 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4027 mmLength4336 mm
2025 mmWidth1792 mm
1497 mmHeight1498 mm
1190 KgWeight1320 Kg
2575 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Renault Clio and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…