DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Renault Clio vs 2012 Toyota Porte Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeToyota
ClioModelPorte
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h—
181 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
220 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,1 ltUrban consumption—
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R15 88t; 195/55 R16 87HTyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4062 mmLength3990 mm
1777 mmWidth1690 mm
1448 mmHeight1720 mm
1071 KgWeight—
2589 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Renault Clio and 2012 Toyota Porte approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…