DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Renault Clio vs 2014 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFiat
ClioModelBravo
2014Model year2014
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
176 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
220 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank58 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
3,7 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 EDCGears6
—TransmissionManual
185/65 R15 88T; 195/55 R16 87HTyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4267 mmLength4336 mm
1732 mmWidth1792 mm
1445 mmHeight1498 mm
—Weight1180 kg
—Luggage capacity400 lt
2589 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Fiat BravoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Fog Lights

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Renault Clio and 2014 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…