DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Renault Clio vs 2015 Ariel Nomad Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ariel Nomad

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 25.5 points.

56.25–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAriel
ClioModelNomad
2013Model year2015
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats2
5Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h3,4 s
176 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement2354 cc
90 HPPower235 HP
220 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 EDCGears6
185/65 R15 88T; 195/55 R16 87HTyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4267 mmLength3215 mm
1732 mmWidth1850 mm
1445 mmHeight1425 mm
—Weight670 Kg
2589 mmWheelbase2348 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Renault Clio and 2015 Ariel Nomad approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ariel Nomad leads the E-Kıyasla score by 25.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…