DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Renault Clio vs 2002 Nissan Bluebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeNissan
ClioModelBluebird
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
175 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
82 HPPower105 HP
185 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength4470 mm
1639 mmWidth1695 mm
1417 mmHeight1445 mm
1035 KgWeight1110 Kg
2471 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Renault Clio and 2002 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…