DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Clio vs 2016 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

58.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelClio
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
170 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
200 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
3,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,3 lt
3,6 ltAverage consumption3,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6 EDC
185/65 R15 88T; 195/55 R16 87HTyre size185/65 R15 88T; 195/55 R16 87H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4062 mmLength4267 mm
1777 mmWidth1732 mm
1448 mmHeight1445 mm
1071 KgWeight—
2589 mmWheelbase2589 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Clio and 2016 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…