2011 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.5 dCi (75 Hp) 2011Overall Score53.25/100
2011 Renault Clio vs 1990 Mazda 626 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 2.0 16V (140 Hp) 1990Overall Score44.25/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 9 points.
53.25–44.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda 626
RenaultMakeMazda
ClioModel626
2011Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda 626
15,0 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement0 cc
75 HPPower140 HP
180 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda 626
4027 mmLength—
2025 mmWidth—
1497 mmHeight—
1461 KgWeight—
2575 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Renault Clio and 1990 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 9 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…