DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Renault Clio vs 1999 Volkswagen Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 10 points.

60.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolkswagen
ClioModelBora
2012Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
190 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
240 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4027 mmLength4376 mm
2025 mmWidth1735 mm
1497 mmHeight1446 mm
1210 KgWeight1360 Kg
2575 mmWheelbase2519 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Renault Clio and 1999 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 10 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…