DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Renault Clio vs 2010 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeNissan
ClioModelAD
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
105 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank41 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
185/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4027 mmLength4395 mm
2025 mmWidth1695 mm
1497 mmHeight1500 mm
1210 KgWeight—
2575 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Renault Clio and 2010 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…