2002 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.4 i 16V (98 Hp) 2002Overall Score47.25/100
2002 Renault Clio vs 2004 Volkswagen Bora Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volkswagen
Bora
Volkswagen Bora 1.6 16V (105 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Bora
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4 points.
47.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationVolkswagen Bora
RenaultMakeVolkswagen
ClioModelBora
2002Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationVolkswagen Bora
11,2 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
186 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
98 HPPower105 HP
127 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationVolkswagen Bora
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationVolkswagen Bora
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationVolkswagen Bora
4150 mmLength4376 mm
1639 mmWidth1735 mm
1416 mmHeight1446 mm
950 KgWeight1360 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2519 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Renault Clio and 2004 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…