2000 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.4 i 16V (98 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Renault Clio vs 1999 Holden Barina Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Holden
Barina
Holden Barina 1.4 i 16V Swing (90 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationHolden Barina
RenaultMakeHolden
ClioModelBarina
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationHolden Barina
11,2 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
186 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1389 cc
98 HPPower90 HP
127 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationHolden Barina
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationHolden Barina
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R13 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationHolden Barina
4150 mmLength3741 mm
1639 mmWidth1608 mm
1416 mmHeight1420 mm
950 KgWeight1420 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2443 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Renault Clio and 1999 Holden Barina approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…