DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Renault Clio vs 1986 Tofas Dogan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeTofas
ClioModelDogan
2002Model year1986
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
75 HPPower96 HP
114 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13; 175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4150 mmLength4316 mm
1639 mmWidth1642 mm
1416 mmHeight1437 mm
940 KgWeight985 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Renault Clio and 1986 Tofas Dogan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…