DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Renault Clio vs 2000 Volkswagen Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolkswagen
ClioModelBora
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
170 km/hTop speed171 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
114 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13; 175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4150 mmLength4376 mm
1639 mmWidth1735 mm
1416 mmHeight1446 mm
940 KgWeight1165 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2519 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Renault Clio and 2000 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…