DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Clio vs 2004 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7 points.

47.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolkswagen
ClioModelPolo
2003Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
185 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
98 HPPower101 HP
127 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength3743 mm
1640 mmWidth1632 mm
1417 mmHeight1418 mm
965 KgWeight925 Kg
2475 mmWheelbase2407 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Clio and 2004 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…