DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Clio vs 2000 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

47.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelMegane
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
185 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
98 HPPower75 HP
127 NmTorque114 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,0 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14; 175/70 R14; 185/55 R15; 185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength4164 mm
1640 mmWidth1698 mm
1417 mmHeight1420 mm
965 KgWeight1065 Kg
2475 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Clio and 2000 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…