DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Renault Clio vs 2014 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.25 points.

66.25–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFiat
ClioModelBravo
2014Model year2014
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
199 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
190 NmTorque300 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank58 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
205/45 R17Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4336 mm
—Width1792 mm
—Height1498 mm
1199 KgWeight1295 kg
—Luggage capacity400 lt

Additional Features

Fiat BravoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking Sensors

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Renault Clio and 2014 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…