DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Renault Clio vs 2013 Skoda Rapid Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSkoda
ClioModelRapid
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
199 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
120 HPPower122 HP
190 NmTorque200 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7
205/45 R17Tyre size175/70 R14; 185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4483 mm
—Width1706 mm
—Height1461 mm
1199 KgWeight1230 Kg
—Wheelbase2602 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Renault Clio and 2013 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…