DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Renault Clio vs 2000 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeCitroen
ClioModelSaxo
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
155 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1171 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
58 HPPower60 HP
84 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13 STyre size165/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength3718 mm
1616 mmWidth1595 mm
1395 mmHeight1390 mm
830 KgWeight780 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Renault Clio and 2000 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…