DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Renault Clio vs 2004 Lancia Musa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeLancia
ClioModelMusa
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
170 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1149 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
75 HPPower70 HP
105 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5 Dualogic
175/65 R14 TTyre size195/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3773 mmLength3985 mm
1639 mmWidth1698 mm
1417 mmHeight1688 mm
985 KgWeight1200 Kg
2471 mmWheelbase2508 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Renault Clio and 2004 Lancia Musa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…