DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Renault Clio vs 2000 Volkswagen Lupo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Lupo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolkswagen
ClioModelLupo
1997Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors3

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
160 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1171 ccEngine displacement1191 cc
55 HPPower61 HP
84 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank34 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption3,7 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption2,7 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption3,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size155/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength3529 mm
1616 mmWidth1620 mm
1395 mmHeight1470 mm
915 KgWeight830 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2319 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Renault Clio and 2000 Volkswagen Lupo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Lupo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…