DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Clio vs 2016 Tata Bolt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeTata
ClioModelBolt
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h15,2 s
167 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1149 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
107 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank44 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15 88T; 195/55 R16 87HTyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4062 mmLength3825 mm
1777 mmWidth1695 mm
1448 mmHeight1562 mm
980 KgWeight1132-1160 Kg
2589 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Clio and 2016 Tata Bolt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…