DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Clio vs 2016 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeHonda
ClioModelFIT
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
199 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1317 cc
120 HPPower100 HP
190 NmTorque119 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4062 mmLength3955 mm
1732 mmWidth1695 mm
1448 mmHeight1525 mm
980 KgWeight1000 Kg
2589 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Clio and 2016 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…