DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Captur vs 2016 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Captur

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeCitroen
CapturModelC3
2016Model year2016
CrossoverBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
171 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
114 HPPower99 HP
156 NmTorque254 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank48 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption3,6 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption2,9 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption3,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4333 mmLength3941 mm
1813 mmWidth1728 mm
1613 mmHeight1538 mm
1262-1290 KgWeight1085 Kg
2673 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Captur and 2016 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Captur leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…