DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2019 Renault Arkana vs 2025 Mazda CX-30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6.92 points.

65.25–72.17
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
ArkanaModelCX-30
2019Model year2025
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
191 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1332 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
250 NmTorque238 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol & Electric
50 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
1 CVTGears—
—TransmissionMT
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4545 mmLength4395 mm
1820 mmWidth2040 mm
1565 mmHeight1540 mm
1378-1571 KgWeight1508 kg
—Luggage capacity430 lt
2721 mmWheelbase2655 mm

Additional Features

Mazda CX-30TPMSISOFIXHeated front seats (3 stages)Dual zone automatic air conditioningWireless CarPlay/Android Auto8 speakers18" black alloy wheelsRain sensing wipers

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2019 Renault Arkana and 2025 Mazda CX-30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6.92 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…