E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Renault 9 vs 2017 Apollo IE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Apollo IE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 53.25 points.

40.25–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault 9SpecificationApollo IE
RenaultMakeApollo
9ModelIE
1984Model year2017
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Renault 9SpecificationApollo IE
—0–100 km/h2,7 s
0 km/hTop speed335 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement6300 cc
80 HPPower780 HP
0 NmTorque760 Nm
—Cylinders12

Fuel & Consumption

Renault 9SpecificationApollo IE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank100 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Renault 9SpecificationApollo IE
—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size265/35 R20; 325/30 R21
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Renault 9SpecificationApollo IE
—Length5066 mm
—Width1995 mm
—Height1130 mm
—Weight1250 Kg
—Wheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Renault 9 and 2017 Apollo IE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Apollo IE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 53.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…