DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Renault 9 vs 1996 Tofas Tempra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.

44.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeTofas
9ModelTempra
1989Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
116 HPPower86 HP
0 NmTorque130 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4472 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1500 mm
—Weight1035 Kg
—Wheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Renault 9 and 1996 Tofas Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…