DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Renault 9 vs 1998 AC Aceca Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Aceca

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 37.25 points.

44.25–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault 9SpecificationAC Aceca
RenaultMakeAC
9ModelAceca
1989Model year1998
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

Renault 9SpecificationAC Aceca
—0–100 km/h6,1 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
116 HPPower326 HP
0 NmTorque427 Nm
—Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Renault 9SpecificationAC Aceca
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption15,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Renault 9SpecificationAC Aceca
—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size255/55 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Renault 9SpecificationAC Aceca
—Length4660 mm
—Width1890 mm
—Height1340 mm
—Weight1615 Kg
—Wheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Renault 9 and 1998 AC Aceca approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Aceca leads the E-Kıyasla score by 37.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…