E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Austin Maxi vs 2025 Audi A8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 53.75 points.

40.25–94
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Austin MaxiSpecificationAudi A8
AustinMakeAudi
MaxiModelA8
1982Model year2025
—Body typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

Austin MaxiSpecificationAudi A8
—0–100 km/h5,6 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
72 HPPower340 HP
0 NmTorque600 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Austin MaxiSpecificationAudi A8
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption10,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Austin MaxiSpecificationAudi A8
—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears8
—TransmissionTiptronic
—Tyre size18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Austin MaxiSpecificationAudi A8
—Length5302 mm
—Width1945 mm
—Height1485 mm
—Weight1920 kg
—Luggage capacity505 lt

Additional Features

Austin Maxi

No additional feature records are available.

Audi A8Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistAuto HoldCruise ControlLane Keeping AssistCollision Avoidance SystemDriver Fatigue DetectionComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsSunroofUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Austin Maxi and 2025 Audi A8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 53.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…