1992 • Renault
25
Renault 25 2.85 i V6 (160 Hp) 1992Overall Score64.5/100
1992 Renault 25 vs 1992 Ford Tempo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Ford
Tempo
Ford Tempo 3.0 V6 (132 Hp) 1992Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Tempo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault 25SpecificationFord Tempo
RenaultMakeFord
25ModelTempo
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Renault 25SpecificationFord Tempo
9,3 s0–100 km/h—
208 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2849 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
160 HPPower132 HP
235 NmTorque204 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Renault 25SpecificationFord Tempo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,5 ltUrban consumption15 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Renault 25SpecificationFord Tempo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault 25SpecificationFord Tempo
4715 mmLength4490 mm
1805 mmWidth1735 mm
1415 mmHeight1340 mm
1300 KgWeight1180 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Renault 25 and 1992 Ford Tempo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…