DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Renault 21 vs 1990 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeCitroen
21ModelXM
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
195 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
105 HPPower121 HP
163 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4710 mm
1730 mmWidth1795 mm
1415 mmHeight1385 mm
1160 KgWeight1310 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Renault 21 and 1990 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…