DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Renault 20 vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 24.5 points.

40.25–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAlfa Romeo
20Model156
1982Model year2004
—Body typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,3 s
0 km/hTop speed209 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
97 HPPower140 HP
0 NmTorque305 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4435 mm
—Width1743 mm
—Height1430 mm
—Weight1305 Kg
—Wheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Renault 20 and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 24.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…