DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault 19 vs 1996 Rover Maestro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 19

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRover
19ModelMaestro
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
90 HPPower60 HP
144 NmTorque121 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 HTyre size175/70 SR14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4248 mmLength4000 mm
1696 mmWidth1690 mm
1412 mmHeight1430 mm
1045 KgWeight1095 Kg
2544 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault 19 and 1996 Rover Maestro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 19 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…